|











|
How I "Do" Poly
I follow a descriptive model of inclusive (family-based) open network poly. This means, basically, that I allow my relationships to develop however they want to naturally, but I prefer to limit my partners to those who enjoy independent friendships with my other partners, or at the very least do not see my other partners as competition for my time and attention. Because of that, my relationships are not easily categorized and may not fit into pre-existing model of a relationship. I'll address the safer sex rules that I prefer to follow first, since those are the easiest and most concrete to examine.
Safer Sex Rules
Priority
Secondaries
Relationship Agreement
What Do I Look For
Summary
Safer Sex Rules
Personally, I prefer to get tested 3 months after every new partner that includes intercourse and/or oral sex, and/or right before a getting a new partner. I maintain what I call HPV boundaries with everyone until I discuss our full sexual history with all potential partners and I have a discussion about STDs to make sure we both have an equal understanding of STDs and risks. To me, "HPV Boundaries" involves no genital-to-genital contact and no oral-to-genital contact. For higher-risk partners, I also refrain from manual- and toy-to-genital contact. After the history discussion, we trade the most recent results from STD tests, including HIV, Chlamydia, Syphillis, Gonorrhea, HSV, & Hepatitus (and a PAP for me that covers HPV and Bacterial Vaginosis) ... and I mean we literally trade the results on paper from the clinic.
Discussing the history and current STD status is mandatory in a full Disclosure Discussion. In order for someone to become a sexual partner for me, our STD results must show all negative, he has to agree to have the Disclosure Discussion and trade results with all his other current and future partners, and he has to notify me of any change in sexual status with any partner, current and future. These are not rules that I impose on my partners and expect them to obey me. These are the requirements that a partner has to complete in order to remain a partner. It is the difference between regulation and consequences. What that means is I do not regulate my partners' behaviours. They can choose to do whatever they want to do. However, all actions have consequences, sometimes unintended consequences. I believe in taking personal responsibility for the consequences of my actions. Therefore, my partners are free to choose to do whatever they want. But if I consider their actions to be unsafe or risky to my physical or emotional health, a possible consequence of their choice may be that I will re-negotiate the boundaries of our relationship until I no longer feel unsafe. This might mean we return to HPV boundaries. It might mean we breakup. It might mean everyone gets tested again before any sexual activity is shared with me. The actual consequence depends upon the individual relationship and the individual action that made me feel unsafe. My partners all have the same rights and responsibilities that I do, in that they do not dictate my actions but there might be consequences for my poor choices and I am responsible for that.
Occasionally, if I judge someone to be extremely low risk (small number of past partners, long time since last partner, clean test results, no current partners, etc.), and I have no other partner or my other partners are all within HPV boundaries, I will occasionally skip the test results but will use condoms for intercourse and avoid oral sex, and I still insist on being notified when he gets a new partner before my next encounter with him. Even if my other partners are within HPV boundaries (and therefore not at risk by my choice), I will still try to notify all partners of any change in sexual status with anyone before I share sexual activity with that current partner.
I am extremely thorough in my sexual history. I keep several records so I won't forget anything. I have a text file that lists all my partners in chronological order of first sexual encounter with them, including first and last name (where known), their ages, and my age for the duration of the relationship. Where a relationship was "on again, off again", I listed the entire duration without accounting for the "off again" periods. I listed what activities I shared with them to indicate level of STD safety, such as whether I used condoms, if I had intercourse, oral sex, toys, etc. This list includes sexual partners with whom I never actually had intercourse with. On this file, I also listed group activities in chronological order, unusual places I've had sex, and fantasies I have yet to realize. Then, because I'm compulsive, I turned that list into a graphical chart. This chart also collectively shows the "on again, off again" relationship as one long duration, but it also shows some partners that have more than one specific encounter, and those are depicted individually. It does not list the specific activities with each partner, but is color coded to show activity categories. Although I have not met anyone else who is this detailed with their history, I will share my chart (with psuedonyms) to give an idea of what a full history can look like:

In order to make this small for the web, it's a little difficult to tell apart the "relationship partners" from the "casual partners", since I use the same color, but differentiate by a pattern on the "casual partner" colors. This is a little complicated, but I also have a plain text list of my past partners in order. Most commonly, however, people just give a total number of past partners. I am also providing a link to Smoocherie's Safer Sex Options page, which has a Sexual Health And History Template. This can provide a starting point for what kind of information you might want to gather from a potential partner.
But how do I do poly? How are my relationships categorized and organized? How do I determine who gets priority for what and when? As I said, I prefer an inclusive open network. It is very difficult to "categorize" my relationships because they often don't fall under a pre-existing model of relationship, such as the primary/secondary examples. Smoocherie has a wonderful page describing the different elements that go into a love relationship and how they can form at least 7 different "types" of relationships. It's not as simple as having either a primary or "just friends". There is a lot of fluidity in what makes up "love". Our society emphasizes the True Love, the All Encompassing Love, the love that provides for all your needs, such as emotional intimacy, friendship, passion, companionship, committment, etc. While it may be wonderful to have a relationship that includes all those elements, that does not invalidate the value of a relationship that has only some of these elements, particularly since these kinds of relationships are far more common. Holding out for that All Encompassing Relationship and rejecting all others also, I've observed, leads to much unnecessary heartache because each relationship can have changing levels of each element over time! I have found that allowing myself to recognize the value that all different kinds of relationships bring to my life gives me the ability to find happiness and satisfaction in a wide variety of relationships and much less time feeling "alone" or "lost" or "I'll never find love!" because I'm not trying to make my relationships fit into a prescriptive box.
Priority
Who gets priority if I don't have a clearly defined #1 partner? I assign priority to situations rather than people. I let each person and each relationship dictate the amount of time and what kind of time they get. If there is ever a scheduling conflict, I discuss with all parties involved to find the most acceptable solution. I have found that stating explicit rules with regards to who gets how much and what kind of time is unrealistic. When unexpected situations arise (and they always do), someone ends up getting hurt because you can't live up to the stated Regulations.
For example. I once had a live-in partner who requested that I always "come home at night". He wanted to take priority over all my non-live in partners (of whom there were none at the time) and requested that I set aside this chunk of my time as "his" time with me. Well, since I had no other partners at the time, this seemed like a reasonable request. I did not take into account the feelings of my future partners who, even if they happen to be secondary partners, might have some emotional attachment to spending the night with me. Anyway, no sooner did I promise to come home every night, then I went back to college. And almost immediately I got swamped with projects and assignments and I had to pull an all-nighter in the lab completing a massive construction project. I had to break our agreement for an unexpected situation that required higher temporary priority.
Generally speaking, I find that discussing each event as it comes up, particularly when those in the relationship are secure about their relationships, takes care of any emotional needs regarding time, attention and "priority". Occasionally it doesn't. Just like in any relationship. And when it doesn't, that gets addressed at the time.
Even when you do have a clearly defined primary relationship (or two, or more), or you have a relationship that tends to have higher priority than others (as in descriptive primary), you still have to be careful not to invalidate your lesser-priority relationships. My "secondary" or more casual partners are every bit as important as my "primary" or more entwined partners. They are human beings with feelings and needs, and by agreeing to be in a romantic relationship with them, I take some responsibility for how my actions affect them. This does not mean I am responsible for their happiness. This means that I am aware of how my actions and words affect them and I can avoid intentionally causing them pain by being insensitive to their emotional needs. Our relationship may have evolved in such a manner as to include less time and attention than my other relationships, but that doesn't mean that the person in that relationship with me is expendable, disposable, or an interchangeable commodity. Tacit has a page on his website that includes a Secondary's Bill Of Rights, which I want to repost here, in full, to help illustrate the importance of viewing all your partners as equal human beings:
|
In a nutshell: I have the right to be treated with dignity, respect, consideration, and courtesy. This is true of any relationship, regardless of its form and regardless of its status. Using the word "right" in this context means "This is something that it is reasonable and normal for me to expect, and reasonable and normal for my partner to give me."
One might argue that these "rights" merely represent a set of ideas that any relationship, monogamous or polyamorous, primary or secondary, ought to subscribe to if that relationship is going to be a happy and healthy one--which is precisely the point. Often, it's easy to forget that a secondary relationship is still a relationship, and the people in it should really keep that in mind.
- I have the right to be treated with with honesty, integrity, compassion, and sensitivity to my needs.
- I have the right, and responsibility, to clearly understand the rules of a relationship. When I enter a new relationship, I have the right to have rules and the reasons behind them clearly explained and to have my questions answered. "Because that is how things are" is not an answer; if I do not understand the reasons for the rules, then I may unintentionally violate the spirit of those rules even if I remain within the letter. Rules should not be added or changed without explanation. I cannot be expected to discover the rules governing my relationship by breaking them accidentally and having them explode in my face.
- I have the right to be a part of discussions about decisions that affect me, wherever possible and practical. It is unfair to be told about changes in the form and rules of my relationships after the fact. While it is not reasonable for me to expect full decision-making partnership in all aspects of the primary relationship--for example, I may not have decision-making power in whether or not the primary partners decide to move away for a better job--I do expect to be part of any negotiations that directly impact the form my relationship takes.
- I have a right and responsibility to set clear limits on the obligations I am making. A lack of primary or even other secondary partners does not mean all of my time and resources are available. Just as I, as a secondary, can not expect to monopolize all of my partner's time, my partner can not expect to monopolize all of mine.
I have the right to ask my partners to compromise and seek to reach a middle ground when possible. I should not always be the one and only one to make changes and do all of the bending.
- I have the right to have relationships with people, not with relationships. That is, I have the right to conduct my relationship with a living, thinking human being rather than with an established relationship or a set of rules. I have the right to time with each individual separately as well as in groups.
- I have the right to expect that plans made with my partner will not be changed at the last minute just because a primary partner has had a bad day. As a secondary, I deal with most of my bad days alone and have the right to expect last minute changes in plans to happen only in rare and unavoidable situations.
- I have the right to a balance between what I give to the relationship and what is given back to me.
- I have the right to be treated as an equal individual (which is different than being an equal partner). I deserve to have my partner spend time in my world as well as visiting his/hers/theirs. My likes, dislikes, desires, hangups, should not be dismissed simply because I am secondary.
- I have the right to enjoy NRE (within reason), passion, and special moments with my partner without guilt or apologies.
- I have the right to privacy. The details of physical intimacy and emotionally intimate conversations should not be shared without my knowledge and ideally not without my consent. This does not mean I have the right to keep secrets from the other people involved; it merely means that whatever rights to basic privacy they may enjoy, I may enjoy as well.
- I have the right to be told the truth at all times. This includes a right to know about fears, doubts and concerns as they arise, not after they become insurmountable. Don't tell me what you think I want to hear; tell the truth -- that is what I need to hear.
- I have the right to have and express all of my emotions. I knowingly and willingly accept that being secondary may place limits on many things (e.g., sharing family holidays or vacations with my partner, having my partner with me in a time of crisis or celebration). My acceptance of that possibility does not mean that I won't be disappointed or even sad during such times. Further, being secondary comes with some built-in challenges to security (especially in the beginning) and there may be times I need reassurance as to how and where I fit into my partner's world. I promise to do my best keep things in perspective and to avoid guilt, drama, temper tantrums and pouting, but I ask that my partner and his or her partners accept reasonable expressions of doubt, disappointment, etc. on my part.
- I have the right to be not just tolerated, but actively wanted by everyone in the primary relationship. I have the right to feel that I am not a problem or a compromise, but that I add value. This may sound unreasonable to some people, but the fact is, if I'm not wanted by my partner's partner, that has an effect on me.
When I am in a relationship with one person, I am in a relationship with all the other people that person is involved with, especially the primary partner(s)--even if there is no romantic connection between us! If I am resented in any way by them, that resentment serves to undermine the secondary relationship and keep it from being 'real'. It creeps into the rules that are created and the definitions that are set in place.
When one partner has problems with a poly relationship, it can tend to negatively affect a secondary partner, creating unhappiness for everyone. Compassion demands that everyone involved work to resolve any resentment that may exist on the part of any of the members of a primary relationship toward the secondary relationship.
- I have the right to have a voice in the form my relationship takes. I am a person, with my own needs and my own ideas about what's important in my life; even when I am joining a pre-existing relationship, I have a right to have some say in the time I can spend with my lover and other things about the form and structure of that relationship. If my partners attempt to impose pre-existing agreements about the form, time, or circumstances under which I may spend time with my lover, I have a right to speak up if those agreements do not meet my needs,and I have a right to have my partner and my partner's partner hear me and consider what I say. That doesn't mean they have to do whatever I say, but it does mean that I can and should have a voice.
|
I am not one for writing up specific rules to be followed, however, I have found that everyone has different expectations and different definitions of words. It is helpful to have certain things written out for clarity. A collaborative effort between myself and other people people with similar methods for conducting our relationships resulted in a document that outlines the kind of ethical treatment and reasonable expectations of a relationship, regardless of its type. It is drafted rather similiarly to a legal contract, but I do not print it out and have my partners all sign and notarize it. It is a useful tool for bringing up specific points in a discussion where expectations are often assumed and not always clearly verbalized. You can download a pdf version. I strongly recommend everyone print one out and use it to discuss individual issues and expectations within their own relationships. It is not necessary to sign it or even agree with each point, but use each point to discuss what your relationship should look like in terms of expecations. Here it is in full as an example of the way I prefer to handle my relationships, the expecations of treatment and the ethical consideration of my partners:
skip the Agreement
|
Proposed Relationship Agreement and Statement of Expectations
This Agreement and Statement is understood to apply to the single relationship between two individuals. For the case where several individuals are involved in a multi-person group relationship, this agreement is to apply to each couple within that group. It is assumed that if each person in the group accepts this Agreement and Statement with each other person in the group individually, it will be universally accepted as proper treatment for the group as a whole and/or the group as a whole will have a separate Agreement and Statement that accommodates the larger group dynamic for any details that are not covered in this Agreement and Statement or that are specific to that group as a whole that does not apply to other relationships engaged in by each individual outside the group.
It is also understood that additional unique rules, limitations, exceptions, restrictions, contradictions, etc., may be applied to the two people in this relationship that are not covered by this Agreement and Statement and are not necessarily applicable to the other partner(s) with whom each individual may also be involved, so long as everyone affected accepts said amendments. This Agreement and Statement is not intended to offer complete coverage for all possible relationships between all possible people or all possible scenarios and situations. Individuals have unique and individual needs and therefore may require additional structure to their individual relationships that may not be required with all of their relationships. This document is intended to be an overall Agreement and Statement pertaining to the ethical and respectful treatment of both people in this relationship and to clarify the nature of this relationship as network-based and intentionally polyamorous with inclusive intentions. |
*................ |
| I. |
General: |
|
A. |
This relationship is expected to be poly and open about it. Neither person should be expected to hide that (s)he is in a relationship with each other nor that the relationship is poly in nature. |
|
B. |
This relationship is a relationship of equals. Neither person is expected to allow the other to make decisions for him/her. Each partner is to make his/her own choices. |
|
C. |
This relationship expects that each individual carries personal responsibility for the consequences (intended and unintended) for his/her own choices. It is not necessary for each individual to police the actions of the other because both partners desire to treat each other with consideration and care and do so by making choices with respect to how those choices affect the other person. |
|
D. |
The basis of this relationship is a mutual agreement that both parties are happier being together than not being together. |
|
E. |
This relationship is intended to abide by safer sex practices. Reasonable steps should be taken to avoid risk of illness. |
|
F. |
This relationship is founded on a notion of intertwined, entwined, inclusive or "family-oriented" poly - that it is preferable for the significant others of each person to be friendly with each other and a part of the overall group and that the significant others of each person do not view any other significant other as "competition" for time or resources. |
|
G. |
This relationship is founded on honesty. The truth may not always be pleasant, but if the truth is so unacceptable that it cannot be shared, there are more significant problems in the relationship. |
*................
|
II. |
Expectations of general treatment: |
|
A. |
If arrangements to be together are made, it is expected that each person will spend that time together unless a very good reason comes up that it will not work out. Such exceptions should be rare. |
|
|
i. |
"Good reason" may include (but not be limited to) work conflicts, medical emergencies, long distance partners/family/friends become available after arrangements are made (covered in next paragraph), important situation or circumstance arises that is difficult or impossible to schedule for another time. |
|
|
ii. |
"Good reason" should also be considered acceptable by both partners affected by the cancellation/reschedule. |
|
|
iii. |
However, even if both partners accept the "Good Reason", it is still reasonable for each or both partners to feel disappointment at the cancellation/reschedule and should be allowed to feel this disappointment without reprisal, embarrassment, shame, or punishment from the other partner for having these feelings, as long as these feelings are not used in any form of retaliation or passive-aggressive punishment for the cancellation/reschedule of the event. |
|
B. |
A reasonable amount of time is expected from each person to be given to the other. Spending time together is a large part of what a relationship is. When there is a long distance aspect, people who generally cannot spend time together should usually take priority over those who can spend time more often. Prior commitments should be avoided as much as possible during such times, to avoid conflict with the above. In situations where conflict is unavoidable and the time in question would not use up an unreasonable portion of the time together with long-distance party, the activity should be adjusted to include both/all relevant parties if at all possible. When not together in person, moderate levels of communication should continue using other means. |
|
C. |
When time is spent together, each person should be treated as a partner in a relationship. This does not mean always staying physically together or constant public displays of affection, but the general level of respect and closeness should be maintained. The way each person is treated should not significantly vary based on any other person who may be present. There are some reasonable exceptions, as follows: |
|
|
i. |
Some activities or discussions are private in nature and not expected to happen in public unless all parties involved are comfortable with the discussion and/or activity; |
|
|
ii. |
Some situations are inappropriate for certain activities because of the setting or content, such as a funeral or a religious observance. Reasonable consideration for relevant social standards should be observed. |
|
|
iii. |
However, simply the presence of other people is not adequate reason to cease acting as a partner, since the relationship ought to be recognized. |
|
|
iv. |
When multiple partners are present, all are expected to be treated as important romantic relationships. |
|
D. |
Each person should keep the other informed of generally important life events. Such important life events may include (but not be limited to): |
|
|
i. |
addition of new partners; |
|
|
ii. |
removal of prior partners; |
|
|
iii. |
changes in status of any existing partners; |
|
|
iv. |
changes in work/employment situation; |
|
|
v. |
changes in domestic location (moving); |
|
|
vi. |
changes in health; |
|
|
vii. |
things that affect ones financial status - not necessarily the actual dollar amount or specific details like creditors (unless the people in this relationship choose to intertwine finances), but overall status and any changes to that status, particularly as they affect this relationship, such as the ability to enjoy certain activities. |
|
|
viii. |
participation in events or activities that are important or significant with regards to one's time and/or one's emotional well-being. |
|
|
Keeping each partner informed of important events and significant daily events furthers intimate relations and is part of the overall human connection and therefore important to the health of a "serious" or non-casual relationship. |
*............................................. |
III. |
Expectations related to other partners: |
|
A. |
Information should be given about potential new partners, and updates should be given as things progress, or information given if it becomes clear that things will not progress. Part of this is to make sure that nothing comes up as a sudden surprise, part of this is to stay informed about each other's lives, and part of this is to assess risk. |
|
B. |
New potential partners are to be informed that you are poly and in (a) relationship(s) before the potential partner becomes an actual partner, regardless of ranking or category (i.e. primary/secondary/tertiary/casual/serious/etc.). |
|
C. |
If a relationship with a new partner progresses, an effort should be made to open communication between a new partner and existing partners directly as early as possible, so an attempt can be made for everyone to get to know each other. |
|
D. |
When possible, friendship between each person's other partners should be fostered. To encourage this, communication between the other partners should be initiated as early as practical, as situations tend to go better when each party gets to know each other sooner rather than later. Optimally, an introduction in a neutral social setting should be made before any "romantic" relationship begins. Any "friend", who is not yet a romantic partner, should have no difficulty attending social gatherings with other "friends". Any potential partner, who is not yet a partner, that does have difficulty attending social functions with other friends that include existing partners may be seen as "red flag" material by existing partners and subject to whatever agreement each person has made regarding "red flag" people. |
|
E. |
Both people in this relationship should have the contact information for the other partners of each person, in order to foster trust and better communication and relationships, to emphasize the interrelatedness, and to allow for easy communication when it is needed. |
|
F. |
Each person's other partners are to be treated with civility. The expectation is that all parties willingly share, and that there is no need to fight over someone or try to control that person in order to ensure the health of any relationship. Acceptance is preferred over mere tolerance. |
*............................. |
IV. |
Expectations regarding health: |
|
A. |
STD information is to be exchanged. This should take the form of an in-depth discussion between both people in this relationship, and between each person and his/her potential partners involving sexual history, estimated risk-level, and assessment of each person’s knowledge of STDs and risks, as well as exchanging physical test results from all possible STD tests given by doctor or clinic. |
|
B. |
Each person and each potential partner should be ready to make or provide copies of said test results for the other person in this relationship and be willing to have the details of the discussion and test results shared with the other person in this relationship and with existing other partners of both people in this relationship, including having the other partners view the test results and/or requesting copies for themselves. It should be expected that these details will be shared with each person’s other partners and their other partners, regardless of whether or not any prevention boundaries are in place. |
|
C. |
If there is a reason to suspect a health problem from a potential/new partner, all current/existing partners should be informed as soon as possible, and certainly before any risky behavior ensues with said current/existing partner(s). This goes for STDs, but also for more mundane illnesses, such as mononucleosis, flues, colds, coldsores, etc. One may choose to be with the person despite some health risk, but each person should get to make an informed choice. Obviously, if one is coming down with something but does not realize, it is an acceptable omission. But whenever possible, each person should be fully informed. |
|
D. |
If there is reason to suspect a possible significant health issue, testing should be done immediately. |
|
E. |
New partners should be tested before actions are engaged in that incur risk. This may not be 100% possible as some risk comes even from actions like kissing, and generally the kissing stage precedes the paperwork exchanging stage, however this is part of why each partner should keep the other well-informed of exactly which risks they are taking, so they can decide whether or not it is acceptable to them. Which is why informing all current/existing partners about potential partners before they become partners, before dating, before kissing, etc., is so important. |
|
F. |
Each person should discuss safer sex precautions with each new partner and come to an agreement about what will and will not be considered acceptable, factoring in any pre-existing agreements from this relationship. That agreement should be shared with each person in this relationship and each person's other partners, and each person in this relationship consents to that agreement being shared with everyone their current/existing partner(s) and new partner is connected to. |
|
G. |
If the agreements that either person has with other people changes, all other partners should be notified as soon as possible. Similarly, if either person's other partner violates the agreement they have, this information should be shared with all concerned parties, as it affects both safety and trust. |
|
H. |
If either person wishes to decrease contact because of perceived risk (physical or emotional health), it is not to be seen as either punitive nor a lack of respect. Each person must make choices for his/her own safety. Life is a balance of reasonable risk for reasonable reward, and it is expected that different people will accept different placements on that scale. Similarly, either person in this relationship may make a statement that he/she has certain requirements for certain levels of contact; this is to be made a simple statement of what is necessary for personal safety, and to be considered acceptable, as long as that person allows his/her partner to choose either the measures requested or the decreased contact. This isn’t to say that decreased contact will not affect the relationship, but that is considered fair. Relationships are about two people who can get along, and whose needs and requirements mesh. If they do not mesh, that is unfortunate, but not a cause for anger and each person should try to keep that in mind. |
*............................. |
V. |
Expectations about conflicts: |
|
A. |
If something is irritating someone or causing problems, it should be mentioned as soon as the person realizes that this is the case and has an opportunity to discuss it. This is to prevent it from festering such that the first time the other person hears about it, it is presented as a large problem or with anger. Neither partner is expected to be aware of the other person's needs or problems unless informed. |
|
|
i. |
If a person does not recognize an issue until it has become major, that is acceptable, as each person is human and may not understand what the problem is until it becomes major and, hence, identifiable. However, it should be raised civilly and with an apology that the person was not informed sooner, and with recognition that the other person has had no chance to address or fix the issue yet. |
|
|
ii. |
However, once an issue has been brought to the person's attention, all efforts to address it as early as possible should be made top priority, regardless of perceived severity, to prevent the issue from growing even further. |
|
B. |
As this relationship is founded on polyamory, if a person's other partner has problems with polyamory, those problems should not become a problem for the people in this relationship. That means: |
|
|
i. |
if an event is to include multiple partners or the person in this relationship is already invited to an activity, the more monogamous partner may not turn the activity into something exclusive. |
|
|
ii. |
If the more monogamous partner has problems with this relationship being obvious in the more monogamous person's presence, it is not acceptable for a decrease in connection or affection of the poly partners around the monogamous person. |
|
|
ii. |
It is acceptable for the monogamous person to have a preference for monogamy, so long as monogamous actions are not forced into the poly relationship. The monogamous partner should still be expected to be treated as poly, since that person is in a poly relationship regardless of personal relationship orientation. This means that the more monogamous person will be accorded all of the respect of an OSO, and assumed to be open to contact and friendship. |
|
C. |
The people in this relationship agree that this is an openly intertwined polyamorous relationship and hence agree to not accept behaviour from their other partners that limit the intentions of this Agreement, such as: reducing or limiting romantic or relationship-announcing behaviour in the presence of the more monogamous partner (II.C), reducing or limiting time shared together (II.B), not sharing safety details with each other (IV.A-B), not sharing other life details as they pertain to the individual in this relationship with the other person in this relationship (II.D), unwillingness to share contact information (III.E), and any other point brought up in this Agreement as well as any specific rule or amendment made outside of this Agreement between the two people in this relationship. |
|
D. |
If another partner has serious problems or difficulties come up, it can be okay to spend time with that person in an unbalanced way for the duration of the problem or difficulty. Helping friends in need is an understandable and admirable thing to do. However, if someone else is in consistent need and seriously affecting the amount of time given to this relationship, that situation should be adjusted. Neither partner is expected to have dependents, and thus other partners or friends are expected to be self-sufficient adults. If an adult seriously and for a prolonged period of time requires massive assistance, they probably need either medical or psychological care that is best not given by either partner in this relationship, and thus that relationship should be altered. |
|
E. |
Each partner is expected to have their own opinions and beliefs. These may not always agree, however, that is considered acceptable and this is not a relationship of clones. Respectful disagreement should not be seen as a lack of respect overall. Each person is expected to have their own judgment, and as such makes their own choices for themselves. Neither person is expected to replace the other person's judgment with their own. |
Remember, I am not necessarily advocating that this contract be taken as a literal contract to be reviewed and signed. I use it as a tool to foster discussion about the various points regarding assumptions in treatment. Feel free to disagree with any individual point when discussing this with your partner, but at least by using this, you will have discussed what you want out of your relationship and you won't let these things go assumed ... you'd be surprised how many of these things are assumed and yet not identical to your partner's assumptions!
So what do I actually want in a relationship? What criteria do I use to select potential mates from non-potential mates? As I said in a chat recently, "truthfully, I would prefer to have deep, long lasting, intimate connections but there is room in my life for other kinds of relationships and there is room in each relationship to evolve and change along the way". But time and energy are limited resources. So if there is room for all these different kinds of relationship, but I have limits on my time and energy, what am I looking for in a person that makes it in under the polysaturation point?
I want someone...
who challenges me intellectually
who complements me emotionally
who expresses himself creatively
who stimulates me sexually
who wants me passionately
who desires me furiously
who is active physically
who is stable financially
who loves to touch me
sexually, tenderly, compassionately, lovingly
who is practical, logical, analytical
who shares my interests
who is comfortable with the day-to-day mundane parts of life
who cares about who I am inside and out
who can control his impulses but
who wishes he didn't have to
and tells me so.
This was once described as "prose meets laundry list", and I like that. I have an essay elaborating more about what I want in a relationship in my Writings category of the Projects section.
I hate to have such a lengthy and ambiguous explanation for how I conduct my relationships, especially for my visitors who are totally new to this whole concept. If you've never heard of this, never thought you could have an open relationship, never been exposed to multiple partners, my explanations of poly can seem rather daunting. But the fact is that relationships, even monogamous ones, are not cookie-cutter. Everyone makes their own rules for how their relationships will be. When you are poly, that could mean that each of your concurrent relationships all look different from each other, as mine do.
The bottom line is that I treat each of my partners with respect and consideration. I make choices about my life based upon how they will affect my other partners and whether the consequences (or results, if you prefer) of my choices are ones I am prepared to live with. I discuss with each of my partners the needs and desires of each individually and work out problems as they arise. I choose to not date anyone who self-identifies as monogamous and I prefer not to date people who are willing to date anyone who self-identifies as monogamous. I maintain scrupulous health records and try to keep up to date with the latest sexual health information. I take slightly more risks to my own health when I have only myself to affect. I prefer to have direct communication with my partners' other partners' and lacking that tends to cause me extreme distress, but the amount of talking we have to do depends on what is most natural for each person. Choosing to live with someone or not, share finances, be "casual", the amount of time shared, how many nights we sleep over, what kind of activities we share, all is decided on an individual basis according to what each partner wants and what each relationship wants. Unfortunately, the answer to most questions about my specific relationships tends to be "depends upon the relationship".
- - - - - - - - - - - -
More About The InnKeeper About The InnKeeper -- Images of The InnKeeper -- INTJ -- Polyamory -- Work -- Quizzes -- My LiveJournal -- My Personals Profile -- Myspace -- You Tube -- My Favorites -- My Bookshelf -- My Wishlist -- Calendar -- Contact
Sorry, only those who are personal friends of the InnKeeper and have a Yahoo! ID can see my schedule. If you are a personal friend and have a Yahoo! ID but still can't see it, let me know. You must also have your own wishlist account and friend me there in order to see my Adult Wishlist.
The Inn Between © 2004 |